mrkby , atherkaii like this.

wizardgenesis i agree as the community now adays are not so aware about global warming.

tintun i agree because the community feel like go green is meaningless, they don't care about go green also. So the governement should put more effort on advertising about go green.

zhengcong I agree as most people are only willing to do something in exchange for rewards.

jackie i agree as people only pay attention to something that they will stand to gain from. even if they know about it, they may not care about it as there are no benefits for them.

wongyaode i agree that Singapore is not having enough incentive in going green. these can be easily seem from teenagers action as they do not have the correct knowledge in keeping the country green and have not put in enough effort to keep Singapore clean and green.

hanyang I agree that there is not enough incentive in Singapore to go green. These values have not been properly instilled into our society and a lot of people still do not know about the crisis that is approaching. Also, with no immediate benefits for the extra effort, many choose to ignore it altogether.

jellybanana I disagree as I feel that there are a lot of incentives in trying to make Singapore go green. Going green is a long term goal. It cannot be achieved in the blink of an eye. Compared to the past, Singapore is "greener" because of all the policies introduced such as "3Rs" and "The Singapore Green Plan 2012". Therefore I believe we have enough incentives, all we need is time.

alvinthen I agree that there is not enough incentives to go green in Singapore. Many people are aware of being green, but their action speaks otherwise.Some of the people still litters on the ground

ujuzgtjacked I disagree that there are not enough incentives, but the incentives are not showing its result. People do know about these incentives, but they choose to ignore it, as they think that going green is a chore.

-Felix

kuanknightz I agree with the statement. People do not get any tangible incentives for going green. They have the mentality of why should I go green when others do not.

- Kee Kuan

weeqihao I agree that there are insufficient incentives to go green in Singapore. Despite the fact that many people know about being green, they felt that they do not stand to gain from taking the initiative to help conserve the environment.

hengnee I totally agree that policies and attitudes have to react fast to the green effort of education.
The Earth that we once know is "changing", not for the better good but for the worse. Yet people in Singapore, or should I say the world, have yet to do any drastic measures to help save our environment and also our ecosystem.
Furthermore, many corporates are using this as an opportunity to earn more money by using the common tag line of "environmentally friendly products" as a selling point to earn more!
In our age, our time, too many people are thinking too much about monetary gains and materialistic dreams. We as the general public have to do our part, no matter how big or small, for the environment and not what that would benefit us based on what it's worth.

-heng gnee

bigshow I agree that the incentives are not that beneficial and clear to the public. No motivation to go green.

-Xu Zhou

thefuturewar Nature is now a buyable resource. Corporate powers and governments have controlled and priced land such that as long as you have money, you can buy as much land as possible and do whatever you want with it. This has lead to unscrupulous use of land.

I will sacrifice economical benefits for ecological ones as long as me and my family will not suffer the fate of not having a rice bowl to lean on.

Countries have other things in mind; they are more concerned about tomorrow’s trade index dropping 50% than their country losing a piece of forest for development. Ecological damage has become a part of life for many countries. Environment will never be #1 on national budget. They would be spending more on home security and evil economics.

thefuturewar My friends and people, the world would come to an end.

Human civilisation would degenerate and pockets of humans would be all thats left of humans.

A major war would breakout in 10 years time as resources dwindle and countries become extremely protective of their own nation. Social instability would set in and society degenerates. The governments would not be able to control its citizens. Its everyman for himself in the future.

Most of humanity would be wiped out in the war. Guerrillas are what we would become. Those with skills and knowledge would be most wanted in factories to supply the war. As all humanity goes into the shadows, they would then be wanted to recreate the living conditions of human kind's future.

The war is imminent, hopefully Polytechnic students with technical skills would be sent to the factories and not the frontlines of war. Survive the war by accumulating as much technical and survival skills as you can.

-Shun Toll

guanying93 I disagree. The attitudes of people are more crucial compared to the policies implemented. Many policies are implemented, however if people do not follow it, he policies are useless. It is important to be environmental friendly as the Earth belongs to everyone. Natural resources are not to be taken for granted, there is only that amount of natural resources. As the world population grows, natural resources are harder to obtain. When the resources are depleted, it takes a very long time for it to renew. In order that our future generations can continue using the resources, we have to make sure we protect the resources. Global warming has brought about rising sea levels, the melting of ice caps and temperature which affect the world's ecosystem.


Hence it is very important for people to be environmental friendly. People in countries, like Japan and Taiwan, sort their rubbish according to rubbish that can be recycled and cannot be recycled. If everyone does that, the amount of waste incinerated and taken to landfills will decrease. When less amount of waste is incinerated, less CO2 is release into the atmosphere. Although many people understand that they have to go green, many people are not doing it, as they feel that since other people are not doing it, they do not have to do it as well. If everyone is having this kind of mindset, it will be more difficult for the Earth to "heal". People can start by making a small contribution as it can really make a big difference.
mount of waste incinerated and taken to landfills will decrease. When less amount of waste is incinerated, less CO2 is release into the atmosphere. Although many people understand that they have to go green, many people are not doing it, as they feel that since other people are not doing it, they do not have to do it as well. If everyone is having this kind of mindset, it will be more difficult for the Earth to "heal". People can start by making a small contribution as it can really make a big difference.

alanwankiathwee93 I agree to it. Take this for example, what are we doing now? replying to this thread via a comp or a laptop? Which is constantly consuming large amount of electricity... Its true that everything have gotten be done one step at a time, but this message about going green has been going on for far too long.. and far too little results have been seen.. The truth is, people cant live their life like they used to. Without electricity, without processed food, without technologies... And this are all that is doing damage to our environment.. And not everyone thinks the way "if i be a little more conserved, and everyone is like me, then we can save the earth" thinking.. Thus.. it is impossible to go green if not everyone is participating in it.

alanwankiathwee93 and heres another thing i have found out. Instead of going green in certain countries.. the scientist are thinking of ways to conserve the earth through technologies (Once again) and not by conserving anything.. In the middle of doing all these researching and so on... they are actually aiding the destruction of earth. Our home.

junting I do not agree that there are too few incentives to be green in Singapore. Since April 2008, regulations have required that all new buildings be constructed to the Green Mark standard. The certification scheme, launched in 2005, assesses buildings on factors such as energy efficiency, waste management and water efficiency. Furthermore, the Green Mark certification scheme for green buildings is proving to be more and more successful. According to President of the Singapore Green Building Council (SGBC), Mr Lee Chuan Seng, 551 new buildings and 65 existing buildings are now certified within Singapore.

Professor Steffen Lehmann, who specialises in sustainable design and behaviour at the University of South Australia, praises Singapore for practices such as integrating ‘greenery in the built environment’, in the form of green roofs and facades as well as park connectors.

However, he says it can do better in areas such as using renewable energy. ‘There is still too little energy produced using solar power or biomass, which is biological material from living, or recently living organisms. The Singapore Government could give more incentives for people to buy solar panels,’ he suggests in an e-mail interview. Singaporeans are also too dependent on air-conditioning, he points out. ‘We need better use of design principles appropriate for the tropics,’ he adds.

Although Singapore are getting more buildings green, Singapore will also need to focus more on retrofitting and upgrading the existing mature housing estates from the 1960s to 1970s so that more buildings will benefit. The Singapore Government is doing a lot in their might to improve the buildings in Singapore. However the main problem i feel is that it is the people are not doing their part even though there are so much incentives implemented.

-Jun Ting

meixuan93 i disagree that there are very few incentives to be green in Singapore. As what jun ting has said above, the government are really trying their best to make Singapore green, for example all building were required to be constructed to the Green Mark standard. The government has also implement water taxes to try and reduce the over usage of water. Personally, i think that us Singaporean have a great part to play. No matter how much incentives are implemented by the government, it all comes down to ourselves. If we don't help keep Singapore a green city. The incentives implemented by the government have little or no effect at all. Singaporeans need to work together with the government to help make Singapore a green city. This makes it so much more efficient doesn't it? - Sim Mei Xuan -

jasmine93 I disagree that there are few incentives to be green. Personally I think that people ideas about going green and maintaining environmental sustainability is still not strong enough, as such like what guan ying has said even though many policies and incentives are implemented, it will be useless if the people do not abide to it.
I think even though the government had already put in a lot of effort to raise people awareness on the importance of going green such as, the project called "Give me a Hi 5" carried out by National Environment Agency (NEA) and the Marine Parade Town Council which aims to get residents involved in the green movement. This campaign, draws the people attention to global environmental and climate change with a bid to get Singaporeans to recycle as part of its core messages are the 3Rs - reduce, reuse, recycle, many still have little knowledge about going green. This may be because the incentives and activities carried out are not attractive enough to attract the people attention or it may be because going green is too troublesome. Hence I think that in order to get people into going green government can come up with more attractive incentives or activities to engage people.
In general I think if every one of us makes small changes in our daily lives — by keeping the environment clean, conserving energy — it will go a long way towards caring for and sustaining the environment and also maintain Singapore as a green city. Jasmine Ng

ning2 I disagree that there is not enough incentive in Singapore to go green. Policies are implemented and awards are given to those buildings and schools to encourage them to go green. One such example is the Green Mark Standard which was launched in 2005. It assesses buildings on factors such as energy efficiency, waste management and water efficiency. Many new and existing buildings are now certified within Singapore, thus proving to be successful to some extent.

Recently, HarbourFront Centre, formerly known as Singapore’s World Trade Centre, is one of the oldest buildings to win the Green Mark Platinum Award from the Building and Construction Authority (BCA). The retrofit of the building has produced significant results, including a nearly 50% increase in air conditioning efficiency and a 30 per cent reduction in electricity costs. Energy efficient lighting was among the measures introduced to achieve the energy savings.

Another example of the incentives is the Green Audit award. The Green Audit award is an annual environmental audit programme organised by the Singapore Environmental Council (SEC). The programme requires schools to obtain information such as its usage of electricity, the amount and type of rubbish generated in different areas in the school and green activities organised by the school. The programme aims to increase the school’s level of environmental awareness and encourage each individual to develop solutions and adopt habits to improve their environment. Hence, by awarding schools with the award, it recognises the schools’ efforts to go green and at the same time, encouraging others to strive for the award.

At the individual level, awards and prizes are also given out to individuals who have shown efforts to go green. The Green Wave Environmental Care Competition is a competition opened to schools in Singapore. The main objective is to inculcate awareness and motivate students to gain a sense of personal and group responsibility for their own environment and in the process, learn how to reason, think critically and act to protect it in a balanced way. The project also hopes to promote innovative thinking among students, encouraging them to develop new ideas, processes and equipment for the betterment of our environment. Awards and cash prizes are given to the schools and students as recognition of their efforts to promote environmental care, as well as to go green.

Hence, I believe that there is enough incentive for Singapore to go green.

-Ning Ning

joylee I think that this is not a matter of whether the incentives are enough or not. Rather, it is a matter of changing Singaporeans' mindset and habits towards going green. We Singaporeans are too used to not recycling things and contributing our part in conserving our limited resources. We always go for the easier way out, in short, we are lazy. For instance, you rarely find any families in Singapore that actually sort their rubbish. However, it is a common part of the daily lives of countries like Japan and it is sort of expected. This kind of habit cannot be forced into every Singaporean in such a short amount of time. Therefore, it is right that the government educates Singaporeans to go green but the effects will not be prominent as of now as people are too used to their way of life. I believe that one day, Singaporeans will adopt good habits that help save the mother earth if the government continues to educate the citizens, especially the younger generation. As the saying goes, monkey see, monkey do, more practical approaches can also be introduced to help Singaporeans adopt good habits. Perhaps, like a campaign?

However, I have to admit that incentives is a way to encourage Singaporeans to adopt the go green mentality and actually do their part and contribute. Since Singaporeans are rather materialistic and have practical mindsets to a certain extend, money is of course the best incentive the government can give. But incentives is certainly not a long term solution. Even though going green is important, we can't use our preciously tax money on encouraging people to go green forever. That would be quite a waste in the long run as time goes by. We can go back to concluding that changing that mindset and behavior of Singaporeans is still the best solution in the long run which is possible through education. The more educated people are, the more they will be able to understand and value the importance of going green.

If I really have to agree or disagree as to whether the incentives are too few, I would be on the disagreeing side. To begin with, this website talking about going green is like holding a world environment day concert. Encouraging people to go green while wasting resources. Please use more environmental friendly methods to encourage people to go green!

-Joy Lee

mdnuruddin Despite the go green campaign, many are still oblivious about the detrimental effect they can cause to the environment such as polluting the air and wasting electricity. They are not able to perceive immediate impact of environmental damage on their lives. Incentives will only make going green optional and people might do it for the wrong reason - money instead of saving Gaia. Government should implement policies that will enforce people to take environmental friendly measures. Go green should start from home such as saving water and switching the lights off when not in use.

p1044029 Our group is doing Question 5 and 8.

Qn 5: "The greatest weapon of mass destruction is corporate economic globalization." Do you agree?

Ans: Corporate economic globalization is caused by the greed in people. With greed, corporate companies exploit other countries rich with natural resources for their own benefits, such as boosting their overall profits of their companies. In no time, the rich companies will just get richer and the other small companies will just get worse as they are basically leeched off by those major corporate companies. As a result, this will just be an evil ongoing process whereby there will only be a few major companies left standing. And if at that point of time they are still so obsessed over money, they will probably use all means to crush other companies which might lead to mass destruction of the World. Therefore, I agree to this statement to far extent.

Qn 8: It was quoted in the movie, that "people are really doing the best they can given their level of awareness". (Deepak Chopra) From your experience, has the level of awareness of environmental problems affected you in any way? What have you done for the environment as a result of such awareness?

Ans: It is clear to all that our environment is suffering, we do not need to be ecologists to know that fact. However, despite knowing the fact that we are aware of the existing environmental problems, we as individuals find it difficult to help the environment in any way. By telling us to save water, electricity, use clean gases and etc, people still do not see the significant impact of those actions that we have done daily. There is a lack of education to show the public how significant our everyday lifestyle can be to our environment. For me, to be honest, have done nothing that I think that has helped the environment in anyway. The methods of how we could have helped the environment were not properly mentioned, therefore this are cases of lost cause even when we want to help.

SPOT/FT/1A 04
Wen Zhe
Benjamin
Courtney
Adele

darrengoh93 Personally, I feel that incentives for going green should only be a side benefit instead of the main reason why we want to go green. By going green, we will already benefit from it due to us enjoying a cleaner and much healthier environment. If we do not go green, the only people who suffer the most in the end is us as the pollution may reach a point which we are unable to reverse the damage done to the earth.

However, I do understand that as Singaporeans, we lack any sort of "green mentality" whatsoever, perhaps we can change that slowly, but as of now the only way we can ensure that people begin to go green is by having incentives. The most basic incentive I can think of that is viable is tax exemptions based on how green one has gone. It is very hard to judge how one should benefit by going green as it is very hard to determine how much of an impact a person’s green actions have done.

I agree that it is important that the incentives, policies and attitudes have to react faster, however the main importance is the mindset of the people. People must want to help the earth so that we can continue as a species instead of just doing it for monetary gains. Our short sighted “goals” of money must be change to the long sighted “ goal” of survival and having a habitable planet.

-Darren Goh DBS/1a/21

ridzvan Although there are many campaigns and speeches organized by various governments over the world to raise awareness among the people about the importance of saving our nature, the message sent is not strong enough. The people will try following a week or two and then forget about the message due to the many obstacles they would have to face. The main one being, MONEY. Many don’t understand the fact that going green is actually easing the strain on their pockets. Instead they are solely looking at the short-term costs they would have to fork out in order to go green. (E.g. the costs of a fluorescent bulb compared to that of a tungsten bulb)

I believe a good incentive for Singapore government to give would be to lower our income tax and instead increase the ‘carbon-waste’/electricity/water taxes to motivate Singaporeans to go green.

-Muhammad Ridzvan
SPOT/FT/1A/04

joshuarong Personally, I believe becoming more environmentally friendly is not a choice, but rather a duty for us living on Earth. We risk destroying our home by refusing to take proper care of it.

Governments all over the world have begun educating people on the importance of being environmentally friendly. In Singapore, we have the 'Green Label' and other programmes to encourage the saving of energy and water in food courts and community clubs. This is actually all it takes for people to begin going green.

Though it is possible that more forceful methods have to be utilized (such as raised costs for energy and water), incentives are a more persuasive method of convincing people to go green.

As it is a duty to take care of the Earth, people should be doing it for the good of the world instead of for rewards. Therefore it is already too much to have incentives at all. I disgree that there are too few incentives to promote going green.

Joshua Rong
DBS/FT/1A/21

crackedcharade 1. Is there any statement made by any of the experts that you agree or disagree with strongly? Why?

“As the species at the top of the food chain, we are the most vulnerable.” – David Suzuki

I agree with this statement. Technicall, the human race is at the top of the food chain. Due to human intelligence and curiosity, we tend to explore and push at our boundaries. We create and we invent, and sometimes, we end up hurting the earth. However, ultimately, it is the growing greed and the endless temptations which push us to do more and to gain more. As what experts suggest, it is the greed for growh (significantly from economic growth) which acts as the driving force for the human race. The geed overcomes everything else, including the environment. The lack of care and maintenance has, over the years, resulted in the earth itself turning against us, and of course, most of the harm upon which we bring upon ourselves. To put it simple, we are the cause of our vulnerability.

6. (Link to globalisation) We’ve become “anesthetized by our own wealth” (48:56) that we don’t see or feel how the rest of the world lives. Is this an accurate reflection of our society?

Yes…and no. The thing about the human race is that once we get used to wealth or the comfor of life, we would not want to change. We only want to improve, not the other way round. Wealth in this context does not specifically mean finincial capability and financial capability alone, but rather, the comfort of life. We see disasters and tragedies of all sorts from the media but the one thing that we cannot deny is that we will never truly understand and empathise with how the people involved, that is, unless we ourselves are put through the same thing. An example, Hurricane Katrina was one of the most devastating natural disasters. Besides Hurricane Katrina, there have been other terrible natural disasters such as the Indian Ocean Tsunami and the Sichuan earthquake. Now, this is the question: Why do Americans only ever mention disasters and tragedies involving themselves? We learn about third-world countries, about countries such as Ethiopia. We learn about them in our textbooks and from websites. We empathize with their plight but do we really understand? No. You see, there lies that very simple reason – that we do not see or feel how the rest of the world lives.

9. As students of your chosen discipline, what can you do to make life greener?

As an individual and as a student, we may not be able to do much but every little thing counts. Simple actions and simple habits fostered could make a difference. People say that we should always spread awareness, but thinking back, do people actually take your word for it? No, not most of them, anyway. One thing to do is to never give up on raising awareness. Set an example to everyone by doing something, be it participating in environmentally-friendly campaigns/activities, re-using plastic bags or even making full use of rough paper. By setting an example and making these your own habits, influence will tap on the conscience of the people around you.

Li Min
SPOT/FT/1A/04

herman 1.
There is a sentence made by an expert, “Governments need to take a more initiative role in reducing greenhouse emissions”. To this statement, i agree. In this globalized world, the concept of wealth is always present. Coupled with convenience and complacency, the world takes nature for granted by over-utilizing it. To tackle the foretold catastrophe of a fallen world, states like US and China, which are among the largest contributor of greenhouse effect, have to step forward and lead the smaller nations into agreement of a better, cleaner earth. To implement them and carry them out, influential nations, which are generally bigger and wealthier nations, need to be seen as committed and determined to change. Talks are nothing if without deeds, the world should know.
Moreover, companies are positioned for growth, be it in oil-gas or any manufacturing industries. To prevent companies from exploitation, laws and policies have to be implemented. Hence, we can look that government is essential in helping reduce greenhouse emissions.

6.
In the world we live in today, money makes the world goes round. Understand that people who have a heart to help are often limited to their own wealth. For a living, no doubt people need to find means and ways to stay alive. But in some instances of the world, you could still find some the love of mankind. Take for example, during the Sichuan Earthquake, huge and profitable organization gave a helping hand. Some help in the name of anonymous. In the rescue of the massive earthquake, you could find helpers, workers and even foreigners, risking their lives in a bid to save the trapped or even to recover the bodies. The world is definitely aware of how the rest of the world lives. Of course, there are black sheep in our midst which are over-anesthetised by their greed that they become self-centred. Sometimes they are those who exploited the poor, those that changed the way how society should really be. However, in everything they do, there must be a purpose and in each and every human heart holds a soft spot for its own kind.


9.
As students of chosen discipline, as an individual, as part of humanity, every single actions that we does count. To represent ourselves and stand up against anti-green campaign is something we can do. I always believe that no matter how small or how insignificant our works might be, even saving the power usage in your house when added up can be huge. If you have the cash, go ahead and support R&D movements. If not, being eco-friendly is a good start.


Herman Wee
SPOT/FT/1A/04

yiying I personally feel that there is no need for incentives to go green.The fact that the world is under threat of being destroyed by global warming and the greenhouse gases,and actions taken hasn't been drastically changing the current situation.Therefore there is a need to introduce incentives so that countries would pledge to do their part to go green.
However,after the screening of the film "The Eleventh Hour", I still believe that there is no need for incentives to go green. From the film, there were statistics that show that the trees are actually providing us service that is worth more than huge global companies' profits combined.and that the service that trees are doing,they are doing it for free.Cleaning the air,preventing soil erosion,all of which that we can't live without.Therefore I feel that there is no need for incentives because we should be part of nature,we should not be driven by money or benefits. We should be driven by the fact that the nature is our home and that destroying it is equals to destroying ourselves.

If more incentives are not needed, then what?you might ask.
The current incentives that are given are to the government sector,the environmental council and such.But what about the education of children?I feel that the children of today should be educated that the earth is going to destroy us as we destroy it and that they should learn more about helping the earth and pledging to improve the environment.
Governments of different countries should also do something drastic and not leave every conference with nothing done.when one country starts to do something,other countries shall follow and this in turn shall help to stop,if not slow down the damage done to Mother Nature.

Therefore I feel that there is enough incentives to go Green.


YiYing

ashleychen93 The issue at hand is not the amount of incentives but the fact that Singaporeans do not see incorporating green actions into their life as being beneficial and that they would be an odd one out if they were to do it.

Incentives can only go so far in convincing Singaporeans to go green. Most incentives come in the form of monetary rewards be it vouches or tax rebates but there will come a point where it becomes too expensive for the government to give out more incentives if the only thing that drives Singaporeans to put in an effort to go green.

However that doesn't mean that the government should give up on improving Singapore's green efforts. The government is the only one with the manpower and legislative power to execute drastic measures in order to go Singaporeans to have a greener attitude. An area that the government could look into is imposing a green tax. Taxing Singaporeans is a tried and tested method where each household could be taxed for their amount of contribution to carbon emissions or weight of non-biodegradable trash produced

Therefore i feel that incentives is not the problem and that the easiest method is that policies should change to taxing citizens so that people's attitude and lifestyle would change even though they may be disgruntled at first, they would come to accept that it would become a way of life

- ashley, crs biomed

vanessafung I agree that they may not be enough incentives to kick start a bigger motion in Singapore to go green, however it is evident that Singapore are progressing towards the goal of going green. The issue of turning Singapore into a green country has been going on for some time now, it is safe to say that we are striving towards the goal with advertisements about saving electricity being brought up and the increase in eco friendly products, however this eco friendly movement is like a burning fire. When the idea was fresh and new, everyone has hyped up about it and remembered to turn of their appliances when not in use. However after some time the fire would diminish and people would get tired of the old idea. Therefore the government should constantly come out with new ideas to keep the progress going.
On the 3rd of March 2010, MPs addressed the issue of transforming Singapore into a green economy. It was said that more will be done in the 2010 budget to boost the progress of this issue. The government has identified green industries such as clean technology as a new source of growth for companies; the government would then further assist firms with incentives and grants in this area. Calls for Certificate of entitlement (COE) system which controls the numbers of cars on the roads, to be tweaked are also done so to encourage the usage of environmentally friendly cars.
In countries like the United States, families are given home tax credits of up to US$1,500 for energy efficient improvement works. Incentives like this could be implemented to encourage a green society in Singapore.
However, Singapore can be bolder with their moves in going green by investing in alternative energy markets such as solar, wind and hydropower. This way, Singapore’s reliance on fossil fuels will be reduced. Like what Guan Ying said, “As the world population grows, natural resources are harder to obtain. When the resources are depleted, it takes a very long time for it to renew.” Singapore is a very modern country, it was progressed this far since our forefathers. There’s a great reliance on electronics etc. It would be near impossible for the whole country to stop the usage of these appliances, therefore finding alternative energy sources would serve as a more viable solution.

Vanessa
DBS 1A/21

samantha93 I think that the problem now is not the number of incentives to go green, but rather the mindset of Singaporeans about maintaining the environment. I feel that the lack of knowledge that Singaporeans have about the environment contributes to why we are not green enough.

Incentives are only measures set to motivate people to be green. Most incentives come in the form of tax exemptions or monetary benefits. Many Singaporeans, having that "money face" attitude, would of course adhere to going green. But then they would have this thinking that the purpose of going green is for money. They probably wouldn't even think about the seriousness of going green, which is to save the Earth. Policies, on the other hand, would make people have the impression that saving the environment is more of a burden than a responsibility. For example, the government collecting additional taxes from an individual who has not been throwing his rubbish properly. This would make the person fear going green rather than encourage him to have that habit.

As such, I think setting up campaigns or public activities islandwide to educate Singaporeans about how the Earth's environment and resources are depleting would be a more viable solution than to increase the number of incentives or policies. To open up the minds of the citizens, there could be door gifts given so that more people will be encouraged to participate in these events. In this way, Singaporeans would have this right mindset about the saving the environment instilled in them, and they would start to do their bit in saving the Earth, by first going green in their motherland, Singapore.

In closing, I would like to say that the attitudes of Singaporeans play an important role in saving the environment. If the public has the wrong mindset about this issue, like only thinking about money, then our society would turn into a greedy one, motivated by money. Therefore, incentives are also important, but I disagree that there is a need to increase them.

The purpose of saving the environment is so that the future generations will be able to appreciate our country and the Earth. All of us should hold a responsibility in this issue.

Samantha
DBS 1A/21

atherkaii "The greatest weapon of mass destruction is corporate economic globalisation." Do I agree? Hell yeah. Greed is an inert attribute of most humans, whether it be subtle or prominent, money or power. This greed is what drove mankind towards success, but it is also what will cause our decline. However, as we mature as a species, this greed can be suppressed, and there will yet be hope to undo the damage we have brought upon ourselves.

-Austen

angshujing I disagree that incentive should be introduced for Singaporeans in order for everyone to go green. People have to understand the fact that going green is an essential need and not for the benefit of the government in any prospect.

In recent years, humans have been destructing the Earth in many different ways for their own benefits (such as: Economic factors, for extravagance resources). Apparently, the government have been publicizing about the need for going green, however, people doesn't seem to have really react to it. By introducing the incentive, people will naturally take that "going green" is something that the Government has request for and not something that they are doing for themselves. It is a natural side of human to do things that benefit themselves, and if that is the case, they are actually doing things on a wrong purpose to start with, and this kind of action will probably not last for too long as they will start to request for more incentives.

On the other hand, if people were to have the mindset and know that they will be the one losing out at the end of the day if they do not start to save the Earth, this would probably triggers more actions. Singapore should start educating the newer generation starting from a tender age as that's the age they tend to inculcate things. While for the older generation, we can only continue educating them, as in the long run, I'm sure people would start to realise the side effects.

Therefore, incentives should not be introduced for Singaporeans to go green.

- Shujing

wingsofsnow I don't think giving incentives is a good idea. Going green should be done for the right reasons, and not the wrong one. If the incentives are removed i'm sure singaporeans will stop doing the green initiatives, as most singaporeans won't do things that will not benefit themselves. Even if singaporeans go green to get incentives then it's doing the right thing for the wrong reason. Doing the right thing for the wrong reason won't be enough to save the environment.
- Teck Wee

ridzvan 2. Over the years the human relationship with nature has drastically evolved. From worshipping nature we started to believe that we were part of nature and now we are living in a world where we are consider ourselves to be the superior species. This might be because of the technological advancements we’ve made which have brought about a great increase in our control over nature. However due to our overwhelming superiority we hungered for more. We have so many appliances that are killing nature in the process of easing our work or to do them in rapid pace. Ironically what many amongst us don’t realize is that by doing so we are actually only ‘sprinting’ towards our very destruction for without nature, mankind won’t survive. Therefore we will need to fabricate our way towards balancing nature and ourselves, in a swift and delicate manner.
9. As a student from electrical and electronic engineering, I believe I can do my part in saving our “dying earth” through inventing or modifying the current appliances around us to run on clean fuels or solar power as a substitute for coal and natural oil. (E.g. like how the tungsten bulb evolved into a fluorescent bulb)

-Muhammad Ridzvan
SPOT/FT/1B/01

mdnuruddin 2. If the human mind allowed us to evolve, ensuring our survival in harsh times of the past, how did it make us suffer in the foreseeable future? What are the flaws of man? (Pride, overconfidence in our ability, selfishness [11:40])
As the human mind allows us to evolve, we develop the capability to think, act and produce which differentiates our species being from the animals. The act of production which is central to human beings makes us more superior as we have control over what and how we produce. This ability also allows humans to produce beyond subsistence level. Competition for the survival of the fittest arises which makes man greedy and selfish. Greed and selfishness drive men to accumulate profit for themselves even if it is at the expense of the Nature. For example, men's activities such as deforestation destroy the habitat of animals in the forest and cause global warming.



9. As students of your chosen discipline, what can you do to make life greener?
As a student from Electrical Electronic Engineering, I can play a part to make life greener by inventing an environmental-friendly product to save electricity. For instance, a device which can keep track of the amount of electricity we used at home. With this device, users can control the amount of electricity used and can certainly save their money. Besides that, I can invent a device which can save water. For example, a device which will be placed at the mouth tap to minimise the rate of the flowing water that can save a lot of water and of course, the monthly bill. Furthermore, I can create a solar energy panel at the rooftop instead of using lights that will consume a lot of energy. Lastly, I can also play my part by encouraging everyone around me like my family and friends to save electricity and water.

-Muhammad Nuruddin Bin Daros

keen 2. If the human mind allowed us to evolve, ensuring our survival in harsh times of the past, how did it make us suffer in the foreseeable future? What are the flaws of man? (Pride, overconfidence in our ability, selfishness [11:40])

From the start, Humans have never been eco-friendly. During the ancient times, we burned wood for fire, we cleared forest for land, dugged mines for minerals and even raze an entire city (think of how CO2 will be released from all those material). Therefore humans have been polluting since the past and not just in the present.

With a much larger population of 6.06 billion people on Earth during the start of 21st century compared to 1.65 billion during the start of 20th century, nature can no longer replenish its resources in time to meet our demand. Perhaps the reason why we are suffering today is as a result of the past where we have always focused on the need to save ourselves from our enemies and where the environment is yet a threat to us.

Thus in this new century our hungry need of resources for our own interest have resulted in a new threat we have never encountered before. Humans are not prepared nor experienced in facing this new threats and thus suffer while the new methods are developed to solve the problem.

keen To add on, beside from replenishing resources, Nature has its own regenerative ability but the current rate we are polluting the environment, it is unable to cope, thus leading to a degrading environment.

keen So what are the flaws of man? Personally i feel that it is our greed that resulted in this situation. The modern world has always been thinking of ways to do things faster, travel faster, grow faster and earn money faster. We are living in a world hungry for speed and efficiency where people, companies and countries constantly tries to be faster in order to outgrow others. A good example can be seen from China where their desire for growth have resulted in negative environmental impacts.

Despite our own interest to be better and more profits, we could have taken the time to research on the long term impacts our technology can bring and find other ways. But which competitor would have done that? The rivals would come up with a new product soon or probably skip the seemingly insignificant long term impact researching process and commercialize the same technology before you do. Our greed to earn the most amount of profit would not allow any risk of loss. At the end of the day the fastest wins and our greed wants to win.

This situation can also be applied in other areas. Military development is an example, in order to achieve idominance and power, your military must be stronger in order to deter others. Thus your development for better technology or capabilities is required in order to stay ahead. An example is the development of anti satellite capabilities. Ever since China developed it and shot their satellite down, the USA soon raced to create similar capabilities and an even better system where they shot their own satellite down by firing a missile from a ship rather than from an aircraft at high attitude. By doing so, the power dominance of USA is secured.

keen However now, we face dangers of debris from the satellite and environmental damage from the hazardous chemicals found in the satellites which may fall back into our environment.

9. As students of your chosen discipline, what can you do to make life greener?

As a student of material science discipline, before i commercialize a material I created, I will ensure that there is no harm on the environment before i commercialize it.

gogreener Why should there be incentives for going green? Look around us, weather conditions are getting more extreme, frequency of floods, earthquakes are on the rise, global warming issues, and many others. Do we really have to wait till a major disaster hit us, with many lives lost, then we will really 'wake' up and do something about it? Singapore, due to our near perfect geographical location, did not experience any of the natural disaster that other countries are facing and hence, we are taking things for granted. It is understandable for older generations to be 'unaware' of the situation but for the rest of us younger generations, we SHOULD know what should be done, by our own initiative and not based on incentives to motivate us. Think about this, we do not inherit the past from our ancestors, we are borrowing the future from our children...

ruskinong Look at this video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLBE5QAYXp8

ruskinong A topic that we should probably look at. But perhaps the wrong platform? This website is meant for the discussion of environmental issues and ideas.

ruskinong Not every youth is apathetic to the environment. And i would say that in fact, probably all of them know about the environmental issues and threats that face us, but the main point is that some of these youths are showing their apathetic attitude because they are already used to their daily lifestyles and habits. So they are not motivated to take the effort to go the extra mile.

So rather than discussing this point, why not take a different perspective? Discuss on how we can get these youths to come on board the environmental wave and really take a pro-active stance towards combating climate change?

alanyeo In my opinion, BYOBD is an effective island-wide campaign. Big enterprises like NTUC Fairprice, Cold Storage, IKEA had participated spontaneously by encouraging its shoppers to bring their own bags, purchase reusable bags or donate 10 cents for each plastic bag. These results in creating public awareness for reducing the massive use of plastic bag.

Although the campaign aims to discourage the excessive use of plastic bags, not everyone would be environmentally conscious and reduce the use of them. It may require some effort choosing the right shopping bag before heading out to marts.
I believe that the it will take some time for Singaporeans to cultivate this habit

teckii93 Personally, I feel that the BYOBD has achieved it's desired results - creating awareness about plastic bag issues. We cannot deny the fact that we do see an increasing number of people using renewable bags these day, given by several retailers. A National Environment Agency survey found out that about two thirds of shoppers supported a more frequent BYOBD. This is certainly a pleasing sight.

I hope that this scheme can be stretched further to produce greater results. Perhaps one day, this scheme will not just only take place every Wednesday, but everyday. Doing our part for the environment should be a normal routine, no different from things like brushing our teeth.

yongjin I feel that BYOBD has being quite effective as much more shoppers are using reusable bags.
Although not every Singaporeans are doing that, but definitely the numbers are increasing. I feel that there should be more campaign to lets shoppers know the importances of reducing use of plastic bags.
If everyone do their part to keep the environment clean and green, it will makes Singapore be a better place to live in..

alanyeo Sharing common sentiments as teckii93 and yongjin, however, i strongly disagree that the campaign to be a daily affair or more of it. The results may be detrimental. For example, if one shop for groceries and necessities fortnightly/monthly during the weekends, it would be inconvenient/expensive to bring/purchase 5 to 10 reusable bag. Problems like misplace of trolley may surface for those shoppers who purchase in bulk. I would support the current BYOBD. It is a soft approach for Singaporeans to attune to the green trend.

jy791 It is necessary to support the enviroment and to encourage people to keep the use of plastic shopping bags to minimum, bring your own shopping bag.
According to the NEA survey, more than 200 retail outlets under Dairy Farm, FairPrice, Sheng Siong, Carrefour, Cold Storage, Shop N Save, Giant Hypermart and Prime took part and have shown that from about 2/3 reduced to 1/3 of Singaporean do not supports shopping bags.
It is a great improvement of our beloved Singaporeans.

However the habit of bringing your own shopping bag to cut down on the use of plastic bags, will take some time to cultivate.

I personally felt inconvience is not an good reason for not bringing the shopping bag.It is like, some bring their umbella out even it is not raining.

I believe Bring your own bag day would be effective if it is a daily basis, and give customer $0.05 discount instead of paying the plastic bag if they use their own shopping bag.

jy791 I understand your viewpoint on disagreement with daily affair for those who shop for groceries and necessities fortnightly/monthly. I agree that purchasing 5 to 10 reusable bags cost more than plastic bags but if we see this yearly(eg 5years), the one who shops actually helps the enviroment a lot. Reusable bag have bigger capacity and durable than normal plastic bags and I personally think reusable bags would be a better choice.
(get a bigger reusable bag with wheels like luaggage also can)lol

alanyeo Agreeing with jy911 that from the NEA survey, one-third of the Singaporeans who do not support, will need time to attune to this campaign. These are the infuriated shoppers due to the inconvenience reasons. Then again, results may be detrimental should the campaign goes 24/7 or to the extreme - no plastic bags at all. Eg. Shoppers will switch to smaller "convenience mart" in the heartlands and avoid those mega marts with no plastic bags at all. It will arise more social issue just to solve one. BYOBD started with 1st Wed of the month since 2007, then extended to every Wed two years ago. Again, i maintain my support to the current campaign, it is effective, taking a soft approach for the significant one-third who don't.

jy791 Hopefully the issue of no plastic bags at all in mega marts will not happen, if this happens definitely it will cause many problems. At most we return the items to the cashier without buying.

Country such as Hong Kong, impose a price of HK$0.50 (S$0.10) to each plastic bag. The levy is to reduce waste. Majority supports the campaign, commented that they don't think it's inconvenient. For their child's sake, it's necessary to support the environment, and collecting 10cents is reasonable. And ofcourse some commented its daylight robbery. However, If the people think HK$0.50 cents is too high a levy, it will have a deterrent effect and people will use fewer plastic bags, said the source.
I believe daily campaign will be more effective than having on every wednesday in a way to remind us. But well,the decision of the campaign is like how ERP gantry or Electronic parking system is built, we can only complain and complain at the end of the day...we still follow.

To maintain Singapore a more green environment and clean country, it just takes time.

jy791 The BYOBD has been an effective campaign. It is not a matter of cutting costs or the impending fee for consumers who do not bring their own bags. The real crux of the matter is that every bit counts when it comes to saving the environment. Similar to the Earth Hour initiative, one may wonder what difference does it make by switching off the power for a single hour. This is merely a drop in a bucket as the saying would go but every drop helps to get the bucket full.

Some people may not even have the intention of saving the environment directly but with the BYOBD, it somehow creates a trend by which people follow with a herd mentality. Well, of course there are those who would not mind paying that extra few cents to save the hassle of bringing their own bags. There are also those who shop in bulk and do not have the option of bring that many bags for themselves and end up having to pay the extra few cents.

Sure, the discount given to those who bring their own bags is a good way to entice more supporters of the campaign. But how long will the carrot on the stick last?

When inflation hits the shelves, the discount will be negligible. Will the shops increase the discount amount? If they indeed do so, this is going to be a chain effect.

Anyway, concluding, I feel that all in all this is a good initiative.

weiliang I have been working in fairprice for 3year plus. Seeing the behaviour of customer using plastic bag before and after the byob campaign start.

Before BYOB campaign is being kick start people are using plastic bag which are provided by the company and i didn't see any customer bring their own. But when the campaign is start, people are complaining of it as they don't really know why should they bring there own bag. But for some they did their part to bring it.

As they knowing that bring their own bag will cut down the waste of plastic bag which in turn cutting down the pollution causing by plastic bag to the earth. And the earth does not belong to us only, it's belong to our future generation.

And as time goes by people bring in there own bag which make them less relied on plastic bag and there is no more complaning of this campaign.

And nowaday the recycle bag are more durable then plastic bag which can contain more item. And people are using it as it's more fashionable with lots of design on it. Which give them the reason to use bring it.

Fairprice also did their part by rewarding 10cents back to customer for bring their own bags for their purchasing item. Which is why more customer are being encourage to bring it doing their part for the enviroment and saving their money. Which they can use the money they save to purchase recycle bags.

More and more company are joining in this campaign, as they know that using less plastic bags can cut down on their company cost. But most importantly is that to reduce the enviroment threat cause by plastic bag. And to cultivate people of all age to bring their own bag habit.

What i can conclude here is that the campaign is a success. As it has make more people to aware of the enviroment threat, and practising minimizing the threat cause to the earth.

alanyeo Yes, the campaign had came a long way and I agreed with weiliang that, "earth does not belong to us only, it's belong to our future generation." To preserve earth for the future, it takes time to educate the public and cultivate this unique habit since the effects are not instantaneous. I would support more of BYOBD at it's current pace.

Definitely not on a daily basis that would have negative effects on the business on all participating outlets. I shared the same thoughts of the previous qoute like, "At most we return the items to the cashier without buying." is one of the many detrimental results expected from 'daily' BYOBD.

After reading much of the comments and websites, I believe that BYOBD campaign aims to educate the future generation primarily rather the current folks. As such it was implemented on an incremental pace since 2007.

p1068957 Jiying-To me personally, i felt that it is a very good campaign.Apart from that, till today it did not actually achieve success.
when it first launches this campaign i felt happy that people has already start to conserve the environment by recycling your own bag.But think again what are they using to recycle? It is still a Plastic Bag which is non-biodegradable.
why couldn't we follow people in America that uses a bag/ paper bags to hold own stuff after shopping ?
but i can't defeat the idea that indeed it was an effective campaign as it does rises awareness to human beings in the world to conserve the earth, to protect the earth. Indeed, in Singapore, i realized that more people are aware that they should protect the earth, and many shopping malls or supermarkets practices BYOBD or to provide shoppping bags that can be bought at the cashier counters.
And that certain people would actually purchase the recycle bag and uses it, instead of using plastic bags.
At the same time, you would also see another kind of people.which are those "Kiasu" type of people that requests for more than one plastic bags when they made payments at the cashier counters.
Hence, in overall.it was a very useful and great idea of BYOBD campaign.But in terms of how effective it is, i believe that it has still got a long way before it really achieve success...

jxchin I personally agree 3 R - reuse, recycle , renew.. is the way to prevent environment become bad . But i total disagree that The Bring Your Own Bag campaign will a not good way because some will be willing to pay for the bag and some will go any day other than that day . And during sale season and weekend , the usage of the bag is more compare to weekday . And why the campaign is not set on every weekend , the usage of the plastic bags will reduce much more because lot of people tend to go shopping on weekend

weichao I feel that BYOBD has being quite effective as much more shoppers/individuals are using reusable bags in Singapore when doing shopping and etc. By doing this action will make Singapore a better environment and clean to live in.
But not all singaporeans is doing this as it inconvience and not practical for office worker working as many people forget to put reusable bag in their office bags when they are rush for work from their house.

What i can conclude here is that peoples still need time to adopt to this BYOBD campaign.

han To me personally- This BYOBD campaign is not as effective as it seem. It is only held on Wed which most of us usually wont go shopping on that day. As @jxchin said, if held in weekends, it is much more meaningful of this campaign. Thus, it will carries out the real purposes of the BYOBD campaign.

It is true that every effort you put in counted. Fortunately, more peoples participate in this campaign even though it is not held on Wed. Therefore, i hope more peoples will carries out this BYOBD campaign into part of their daily lifestyle. This way, singaporeans will be more positive and actively toward gogreen activities.

zjj In my opinon, this campaign is not so effective.First, only a few people will go shopping on wednesday, this means the campaign is not so popular. Second, people will prefer the "convenient" mart, which offer plastic bags. Some people may think that government should introduce a new policy which all shops should stop using plastic bags. However, there is a large amount of people who reuse plastic bags to contain rubbish and throw them away. Some of them really have environmentally conscious, but they cannot find any repalcement which is as cheap and conveinient as plastic bag. Consequently, if we cannot find a suitable substitute, singaporeans cannot reduced the use of plastic bags.

ozrj I feel that the BYOBD is not very effective as very little people are willing to bring reusable bags. Most of them will feel that it is very troublesome to bring reusable bag everywhere they go and they would rather give up on the discount given for bringing their own bags and even to pay for the plastic bags they use. Of course, there are still a handful of people who are willing to bring their own bags on the BYOBD. However, they are too used to using the plastic bags given and very often will forget to bring the reusable bags, in the end, they still have got to use the plastic bags the shops provide. In my opinion, more days of a week should be made the BYOBD so that Singaporeans are get more exposed to situations in which they have to use their own bags instead of using the plastic bags provided. I believe that the campaign will be more effective in that way as people will get used to bringing their own bags by needing to bring it more frequently.

hello I feel that BYOBD campaign is effective to a limited extent. Only minority people (for example those who really care about the environment and housewives etc.) would bring their own plastic bags. However for the majority of the public, firstly, they forget about this BYOBD because they are too used to have the plastic bags given to them at the end of their purchase. Eventually would still purchase the plastic bags. Secondly, they can choose not to make their purchase on Wednesday. They still have others days to buy their goods from the supermarket which provide them with the plastic bags.

Although it has created public awareness that we should reduce the amount of plastic bags used but it has not achieved its ultimate goal of reducing the excessive use of plastic bags. I feel that we should have this BYOBD campaign more days in a week so that they are ‘consistently reminded’ about this campaign. Only then the campaign will achieved its ultimate aim. Otherwise it will take some more years before it will achieve its final goal.

yinmonmonthin In my opinion,I am totally agree with ozrj.yes......most of people will feel that it is very troublesome to bring reusable bag everywhere they go. We can't say that we will go for shopping everyday after work or go straight home end of the day.So, my suggestion is that we should use paper bags at all at every shops ,supermarkets and fairprice in each and every country to reduce the environment threat cause by plastic bags.

fareed To me I agree with BYOBD to a certain extent. I agree with the idea of bringing your own bag as an evironmental awareness campaign as to lessen the use of plastic bags.Research shows that the use of plastic bags can cause environmental damage as it takes up to 1000 years to decay properly. In addition to that, it is non renewable as it is made from petrochemicals. However I feel that youths will not start practicing it everyday.

The awareness is an interesting concept as it allows shoppers to feel less discouraged to bring their own bags rather than a reused plastic bag everytime. It is also less troublesome to bring your own bags as plastic bags can be torn easily.

However, the awareness can only be interesting if creativity is mixed with concept. BYOBD is interesting when an idea of art mix with concept where we can make decoration to our own bags to shop. It's a concept of style as it can reach out to the youths too.

All in all,Awareness campaigns are the first step to raise awareness to people. the second step is for someone to practise it. The environment is ours to control and protect. It's our home. It takes years to make effort to save the world but it takes seconds to destroy it.

hkh I feel that BYOBD campaign have not been as effective as it seems. The campaign should have increased the number of days to like 3 days per week. I do not think having 3 days per week for the campaign will discourage people from shopping.

I feel that BYOBD campaign should emphasize more on the disadvantage of using plastic bags and the advantage of enviroment bags. I feel that the cost of plastic bags that should be paid on BYOBD days should increase to 30-50 cents. This is to encourage people to buy enviroment bags for shopping and refrain from using plastic bags.

Having only wednesday as BYOBD day, people will simply avoid that day to shop. Although increasing the number of days of BYOBD campaign will discourage people from shopping but is it worth the cost of saving for the enviroment bags to purchase lower quality product or purchase from shops that you did not frequent.

I feel that BYOBD have not done enough to increase Singaporeans awareness to plastic bags disadvantage.

ss13 Personally, i think BYOBD is a good campaign to encourage singaporeans to bring their own shopping bags. But singaporeans are not really using it to our advantage as plastic bags are still being given out.

If supermarket were to stop using plastic bags, maybe singaporeans would bring their own shopping bags. Its not a burden to carry your own shopping bag. The shopping bag can be fold and be kept in our bag. It is not a difficult task to do.

I agree with hkh that this campaign have not done enough promotion to encourage singaporeans to bring their shopping bag.

zhihui In my opinion, this campaign has proven to be effective. Taking my mum as an example, she would definitely bring her own recyclable bags when heading to Cold Storage or Giant hypermart.

Not only does the recyclable bag help in conserving the environment, it is also more convenient for us when 2 - 3 plastic bags worth of goods can be placed in 1 recyclable bag. We save the environment and at the same time make things easier for ourselves!

From what I observe when I visit the supermarkets myself, there are people using the recyclable bags even on other days other than Wednesday!

However, to further improve the objective of this campaign, I feel that there is a need to slowly increase Bring Your Own Bag Day to Bring Your Own Bag Days. Rather than just restrict the campaign to a day, make this a part of our lives and a habit for us to culture.

faisal I personally feel that this BYOBD campaign is not effective. Although it encourages Singaporeans to bring their own bags, many still chooses not to participate.

I agree with ss13 that Singaporeans do not use this opportunity to actually help the environment and plastic bags are still being given out. Therefore the problem here is that most Singaporeans are not aware about this campaign.

For example, frequent customers like a mother or maids are usually more aware about this campaign but unlike us who seldom shop in those participating retailers are less likely to know. So, to create awareness in the campaign, more shops has to participate in this campaign to provide awareness to the different age groups.

dgwm Personally, I feel that with this campaign it is quite useful as it brings the people awareness to cut down the use of plastic bag. As big enterprises company like NTUC is helping it out by having no plastic bag on wednesday. They even charge slightly lesser for those who bring their own bag to put their stuff on other days.

In my opinion, I feel that singaporean is still not very environmentally conscious. As most of the shopping mall is still using plastic bag. It will need some more times for singaporean to get used of this idea where they will bring their own bag to shopping. Thus, some solution I got are this company should at least set more then one day not to have plastic bags. This way it will help them to cultivate their awareness even more and be more enviromentally conscious.

shakisdoinghiswork When it first started, I thought this was a horrible idea. But over the years I've seen it grow into something worth noticing. My mother goes to the market almost everyday to get stuff. Then one day I realized that she was bringing plastic bags with her. Curious I followed her to the stores that day and a whole load of people actually brought their own bags. It may be just my neighborhood, but given time I think this could really grow into something big. It could even expand to 2 or more days. I guess its hard to evaluate the effects of this initiation now. Over time, who knows?

jiao485573 In my opinion , i feel this campain is a very good idea. The government always trying to encourage the people to practice recycle or ther ways to conserve our environment. However, not every one will practice it. According to the Greenpeace website, around 100 million tonnes of plastic are produced each year. However, these plastic bags are non-biodigradable. With this campain, singaporean may develope a habit of bring their own bags and reduce the use of plastic bags and help to conserve our environment.

samuel0906218 To what i feel, this campaign is a good idea to bring awareness to singaporeans that plastic are non-biodegradable and they should cut down on the usage of plastics.As burning of plastics causing the earth o-zone layer to be destroyed, causing global warming and climate changes issues. However, not everyone will practice it. Singaporeans tend to have the "kiasu" attitude and they would rather take more then they need to keep at home for their own usage. Furthermore, they are not used to having this kind of practice in bringing their own bags. Therefore i think this campaign is not effective enough yet, and also singaporeans are not trying to more environmentally conscious neither in reducing plastic usage.

gogreener Another alternative, choose 100% oxo-biodegradable plastic bags. However, reducing and reusing plastic bags are still the way to go!